<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wikipedia on trial #1</title>
	<link>http://things.auditblogs.com/2008/06/03/wikipedia-on-trial-1/</link>
	<description>A blog of incomprehension</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 21:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: John A</title>
		<link>http://things.auditblogs.com/2008/06/03/wikipedia-on-trial-1/#comment-357</link>
		<dc:creator>John A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 10:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://things.auditblogs.com/2008/06/03/wikipedia-on-trial-1/#comment-357</guid>
		<description>True enough. Wikipedia is a tabloid encyclopedia of trivia. Anything else is simply a stretch of logic too far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True enough. Wikipedia is a tabloid encyclopedia of trivia. Anything else is simply a stretch of logic too far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Basho</title>
		<link>http://things.auditblogs.com/2008/06/03/wikipedia-on-trial-1/#comment-356</link>
		<dc:creator>Basho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 14:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://things.auditblogs.com/2008/06/03/wikipedia-on-trial-1/#comment-356</guid>
		<description>Clearly, Wikipedia was unable to resist including a passage concerning young boys with their trousers down being gleefully whipped.

It's somewhat illustrative. Wikipedia in essence unleashes market forces (in the way of, whatever the majority of interested parties want will generally prevail) upon information in the environment of anonymity and convenience of the internet. It has been well documented that the sort of business most likely to succeed on the internet is pornography, so why should Wikipedia's output be any different?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clearly, Wikipedia was unable to resist including a passage concerning young boys with their trousers down being gleefully whipped.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s somewhat illustrative. Wikipedia in essence unleashes market forces (in the way of, whatever the majority of interested parties want will generally prevail) upon information in the environment of anonymity and convenience of the internet. It has been well documented that the sort of business most likely to succeed on the internet is pornography, so why should Wikipedia&#8217;s output be any different?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
